Platforms: Difference between revisions
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
== Curating Your Feed == | == Curating Your Feed == | ||
Knowing how to create an [[information]] [[environment]] that promotes [[learning]] and [[happiness]] is a critical skill in the modern age. | |||
=== Life is an IRL Newsfeed === | === Life is an IRL Newsfeed === | ||
Line 40: | Line 41: | ||
Since the principles of [[free speech]] make most regulatory solutions to this problem as untenable as they are undesirable, if people recognize the emotional manipulation of the media and make a conscious choice to ignore it instead of giving in to [[temptation]] and [[outrage]], then the [[incentive]] to keep producing this content will quickly go away. | Since the principles of [[free speech]] make most regulatory solutions to this problem as untenable as they are undesirable, if people recognize the emotional manipulation of the media and make a conscious choice to ignore it instead of giving in to [[temptation]] and [[outrage]], then the [[incentive]] to keep producing this content will quickly go away. | ||
== The Legacy Media Problem == | |||
[[Trust]] in the major media [[institutions]] is at an all-time low. This has ironically led many people to give their [[trust]] to those who transparently peddle [[misinformation]], [[conspiracy theories]], [[pseudoscience]], and [[grift]]. This is due to the [[contrarian]] position that anything the untrustworthy legacy media rejects must be true, since they always lie. | |||
This position represents a fundamental misunderstanding of ''how'' the legacy media lies. Factual correctness is not their issue. Legacy media believes that its [[trust]] is based on factual correctness, and they employ fact checkers and editors whose job it is to make sure those factual errors aren't published or broadcast. While they aren't perfect, they at least have a system in place to verify factual accuracy. The vast majority of new media is completely unchecked. | |||
The legacy media lies by [[wikipedia:Sin_of_omission|omission]]. It lies in which stories it chooses to cover and which ones it ignores. It lies by repeating the opinions of politicians and oligarchs without questions or context. It lies by promoting stories from [[advertising]] sponsors and burying negative stories about them. It lies by presenting [[politics]] as a team sport for ratings, instead of a collaboration about how best to improve the country. It lies because the opinions represented in their editorial board reflect [[ideologies]] of the elite [[institutions]] they graduated from, making them unlikely to have viewpoints outside of the mainstream. | |||
[https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/12617.Manufacturing_Consent Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky's Manufacturing Consent] is the quintessential book on this subject. [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/848628.Necessary_Illusions Necessary Illusions] is another excellent book examining the nature of [[ideology]] and [[propaganda]] in the legacy media. | |||
== Dead Internet and Enshittification == | |||
The fact that [[AI]]-driven bots have taken over most online platforms has caused some to theorize that real human discourse is disappearing and being replaced by bots and [[AI]]<nowiki/>s talking to each other. This is known as the [[wikipedia:Dead_Internet_theory|Dead Internet Theory]]. | |||
More generally, [[wikipedia:Enshittification|Enshittification]] is the tendency for platforms to degrade as the average intelligence of the user base steadily drops once it grows past the early adopters and into the mainstream. Some of this is due to bots, some of it is [[trolling]], some is [[propaganda]], and a whole lot is due to the [[wikipedia:Dunning–Kruger_effect|Dunning-Kruger effect]]. | |||
== Podcasts on Platforms == | == Podcasts on Platforms == |
Revision as of 21:26, 26 December 2024

What is a Platform?
Platforms is used as a generalized term to refer to the online information ecosystems created by social media and other tech companies, as well as legacy media and other mass communication platforms.
This can include operating systems, online games, Virtual Reality worlds with familiar names, messaging systems, email, radio, TV, or any other system that allows large numbers of people to connect and share ideas.
While social media as a concept is likely to be dated within a few years, new platforms will replace them. Therefore, discussions around social media issues, such as Freedom of Speech, will refer to them as Platforms since the same issues around hate speech, trolling, and content moderation that must be addressed.
For a full account of what social media does to our brains, especially for children, The Anxious Generation by Jonathan Haidt has a bestselling book and many practical resources for taking action. There is even a whole chapter dedicated to secular spirituality and its necessity for finding happiness.
Lowered Cost of Speech
Lies are Free. The truth costs money. Traditional print and broadcast media had significant production costs. Social media has zero production costs. Very few people would spend money on trolling, but they'll happily spend all day doing it for free.
Newsfeeds
The never-ending scrolling newsfeeds that these platforms offer provide an algorithmically-generated stream of consciousness that supplants your own with the random mix memes, pictures of children and people on vacations, outrage porn, propaganda, and political hate speech.
The promotion of content via AI algorithms designed to maximize the time you spend scrolling down the endless rabbit hole is inherently antithetical to happiness.
Curating Your Feed
Knowing how to create an information environment that promotes learning and happiness is a critical skill in the modern age.
Life is an IRL Newsfeed
The experience of consciousness is similar to the never-ending scroll of the newsfeed, as well as the training of Artificial Intelligence. However, your brain is the AI you are training, and everything you see, taste, touch, read, hear, or watch is the content of your feed that forms the training dataset. And just like AI, if your training dataset is full of racism, hate, misogyny, and other terrible ideas, when it comes time for someone to ask you a question you are going to repeat those ideas in your answers.
Have a Nice Internal Monologue
Another part of your feed is the internal monologue. The things you say to yourself have a huge impact on your emotions and beliefs. If you say good things about yourself in your internal monologue, then you will reinforce those beliefs and experience the same emotions that you get when someone else says nice things about you. If you tell yourself that you are stupid, worthless, and incompetent, then you will feel that way as well.
Careful What You Follow
Nurture your brain with ideas that are optimistic, promote wonder and joy, and most importantly, evidence-based. Content producers that regularly promote hyperbolic outrage should be avoided, especially when you agree with their point of view. They are not influencing you or providing useful information, they are using you for clicks. Do not sacrifice your peace of mind for their monetization.
It goes without saying that training your internal AI on misinformation, pseudoscience, superstition, and conspiracy theories will produce output containing massive hallucinations and render it utterly useless for any practical applications.
If you do not curate your newsfeed, in social media, traditional media, and in the social interaction you make part of your life, then you free will be shaped by the corporations, politicians, and grifters who aim to profit from it.
Recognize and Reject Clickbait
The only way to fight the trend towards outrage content that destroys our minds and our democracies is to make it taboo in popular culture. Our brains naturally gravitate towards this kind of content, and extensive A/B testing has proven it to be the case. However, clickbait is modern temptation. It is a snake with an electronic apple, beckoning you to indulge your worst thoughts so you will be more susceptible to grift.
Since the principles of free speech make most regulatory solutions to this problem as untenable as they are undesirable, if people recognize the emotional manipulation of the media and make a conscious choice to ignore it instead of giving in to temptation and outrage, then the incentive to keep producing this content will quickly go away.
The Legacy Media Problem
Trust in the major media institutions is at an all-time low. This has ironically led many people to give their trust to those who transparently peddle misinformation, conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and grift. This is due to the contrarian position that anything the untrustworthy legacy media rejects must be true, since they always lie.
This position represents a fundamental misunderstanding of how the legacy media lies. Factual correctness is not their issue. Legacy media believes that its trust is based on factual correctness, and they employ fact checkers and editors whose job it is to make sure those factual errors aren't published or broadcast. While they aren't perfect, they at least have a system in place to verify factual accuracy. The vast majority of new media is completely unchecked.
The legacy media lies by omission. It lies in which stories it chooses to cover and which ones it ignores. It lies by repeating the opinions of politicians and oligarchs without questions or context. It lies by promoting stories from advertising sponsors and burying negative stories about them. It lies by presenting politics as a team sport for ratings, instead of a collaboration about how best to improve the country. It lies because the opinions represented in their editorial board reflect ideologies of the elite institutions they graduated from, making them unlikely to have viewpoints outside of the mainstream.
Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky's Manufacturing Consent is the quintessential book on this subject. Necessary Illusions is another excellent book examining the nature of ideology and propaganda in the legacy media.
Dead Internet and Enshittification
The fact that AI-driven bots have taken over most online platforms has caused some to theorize that real human discourse is disappearing and being replaced by bots and AIs talking to each other. This is known as the Dead Internet Theory.
More generally, Enshittification is the tendency for platforms to degrade as the average intelligence of the user base steadily drops once it grows past the early adopters and into the mainstream. Some of this is due to bots, some of it is trolling, some is propaganda, and a whole lot is due to the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Podcasts on Platforms
Some relevant podcast episodes discussing the dangers of social media, how to improve our platforms, developing new social norms regarding Internet usage, and other relevant topics.
Platforms on Platforms
Criticism of social media platforms, published on the very same platforms, for your viewing pleasure.
This video does a great job of linking the grift economy to the Enshittification of the Internet.