Politics: Difference between revisions
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
The left/right political dynamic of the United States is often used as a reference point. However, they are more correctly framed in terms of [[Progressive]] and [[Libertarian]] political [[philosophies]] rather than the Democratic and Republican parties. This is because the actual political thinkers and developers of new policy are coming from these sub-groups, who are not always strictly affiliated with either party. It also somewhat ignores right-wing Christian Nationalism and [[Fascism]], which are scary and must be opposed, but offer few debatable policy positions. In a discussion of [[best practices]], we must consider actual policy rather than the exercise of raw [[power]]. | The left/right political dynamic of the United States is often used as a reference point. However, they are more correctly framed in terms of [[Progressive]] and [[Libertarian]] political [[philosophies]] rather than the Democratic and Republican parties. This is because the actual political thinkers and developers of new policy are coming from these sub-groups, who are not always strictly affiliated with either party. It also somewhat ignores right-wing Christian Nationalism and [[Fascism]], which are scary and must be opposed, but offer few debatable policy positions. In a discussion of [[best practices]], we must consider actual policy rather than the exercise of raw [[power]]. | ||
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yYwnPvuTQE||center|The Evolution of World Democracies|frame}} | == Depolarization and Decalcification == | ||
The primary political [[perspective]] being advocated by [[metaculture]] is that [[wikipedia:Political_polarization|polarization]], and its more intransigent form calcification, must be opposed. Functional government requires a [[balance of power]] between opposing viewpoints who still see each other as part of a common [[in-group]]. [[Social media]] [[platforms]] have deployed [[outrage]]-based [[algorithms]] that have had the side-effect of promoting particularly polarized political [[perspectives]]. Often these views are far outside the realm of anything practical or desirable, but the [[memes]] spread because our [[outrage]] causes to say "look at what the crazy people on the [[In-group|other side of the aisle]] are saying!" when real people weren't actually saying it until you shared it. And now that it's been shared, real people start to [[believe]] it! Then bad actors and [[trolls]] that only wish to sew chaos and confusion start using it for [[propaganda]], amplifying its reach dramatically. This cycle must be broken, and it starts with curating the sources of [[information]] that we train our [[Brains|brain's]] [[neural networks]] with. | |||
The [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|evidence]] shows that [[happier]] [[societies]] are the ones that have implemented [[progressive]] reforms like [[universal health care]], worker's rights, and strong social safety nets. [[History]] has also shown that ostensibly [[progressive]] reformers who eliminate their opposition through [[revolution]] and are able to rule unchecked will quickly veer into [[authoritarianism]]. We must strive for self-improvement in government using only [[democratic]] means, with a [[Good Faith Conservatism|good faith conservative]] opposition that keeps liberal excesses in check. | |||
The current state of stagnation and lack of progress is due primary to the fact that the political conversation has lost sight of any common goal that all citizens are striving for regardless of party. By focusing on that goal (improving the overall [[happiness]] of a nation's citizens) we can return to seeing each other as cooperating partners in achieving this goal instead of adversaries pursuing different goals. | |||
The use of language is very important for anyone attempting to bridge political divides. Avoid triggering words that have been used extensively in propaganda, like [[socialism]], [[communism]], [[fascism]], etc. since these only cause visceral [[emotional]] reactions rather than indicating any shared [[concept]] of policy. Focus on individual issues rather than party advocacy. Avoid using language that indicates a strong affiliation with their perceived [[out-group]]. Study the [[psychology]] of [[persuasion]] and put it into practice to promote a [[perspective]] that precludes polarization. | |||
If you truly [[believe]] the [[universal]] [[truth]] that "we are all one," then this means our political [[Out-group|out-groups]] too. No person is an [[enemy]]. It's time to put this [[belief]] into practice.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yYwnPvuTQE||center|The Evolution of World Democracies|frame}} | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
Some videos presenting non-partisan proposals for how to correct political [[incentives]] and restore the [[balance of power]] in US politics. | Some videos presenting non-partisan proposals for how to correct political [[incentives]] and restore the [[balance of power]] in US politics. |
Revision as of 09:31, 18 August 2024

A discussion of political theories and how their ideas contribute to what we know about best practices for governing a society and increasing the quality of life.
Best Practices in Government and Politics
The general principles of evidence-based governance should be modeled on the those countries with the highest Quality of Life indicators.
In the countries with the greatest happiness and well-being, the following principles are nearly universal, with the happiest countries having the strongest systems in place for each.
- Democracy
- Freedom of Speech
- Religious Freedom
- Freedom in general
- Balance of Power
- Separation of Church and State
- Public Education
- Social Safety Net
- Universal Health Care
- Equal Justice for all citizens
- Mixed Economy with the best elements of Socialism and Capitalism
Other Practices in Government and Politics
Not the best, but the rest.
The left/right political dynamic of the United States is often used as a reference point. However, they are more correctly framed in terms of Progressive and Libertarian political philosophies rather than the Democratic and Republican parties. This is because the actual political thinkers and developers of new policy are coming from these sub-groups, who are not always strictly affiliated with either party. It also somewhat ignores right-wing Christian Nationalism and Fascism, which are scary and must be opposed, but offer few debatable policy positions. In a discussion of best practices, we must consider actual policy rather than the exercise of raw power.
Depolarization and Decalcification
The primary political perspective being advocated by metaculture is that polarization, and its more intransigent form calcification, must be opposed. Functional government requires a balance of power between opposing viewpoints who still see each other as part of a common in-group. Social media platforms have deployed outrage-based algorithms that have had the side-effect of promoting particularly polarized political perspectives. Often these views are far outside the realm of anything practical or desirable, but the memes spread because our outrage causes to say "look at what the crazy people on the other side of the aisle are saying!" when real people weren't actually saying it until you shared it. And now that it's been shared, real people start to believe it! Then bad actors and trolls that only wish to sew chaos and confusion start using it for propaganda, amplifying its reach dramatically. This cycle must be broken, and it starts with curating the sources of information that we train our brain's neural networks with.
The evidence shows that happier societies are the ones that have implemented progressive reforms like universal health care, worker's rights, and strong social safety nets. History has also shown that ostensibly progressive reformers who eliminate their opposition through revolution and are able to rule unchecked will quickly veer into authoritarianism. We must strive for self-improvement in government using only democratic means, with a good faith conservative opposition that keeps liberal excesses in check.
The current state of stagnation and lack of progress is due primary to the fact that the political conversation has lost sight of any common goal that all citizens are striving for regardless of party. By focusing on that goal (improving the overall happiness of a nation's citizens) we can return to seeing each other as cooperating partners in achieving this goal instead of adversaries pursuing different goals.
The use of language is very important for anyone attempting to bridge political divides. Avoid triggering words that have been used extensively in propaganda, like socialism, communism, fascism, etc. since these only cause visceral emotional reactions rather than indicating any shared concept of policy. Focus on individual issues rather than party advocacy. Avoid using language that indicates a strong affiliation with their perceived out-group. Study the psychology of persuasion and put it into practice to promote a perspective that precludes polarization.
If you truly believe the universal truth that "we are all one," then this means our political out-groups too. No person is an enemy. It's time to put this belief into practice.
Some videos presenting non-partisan proposals for how to correct political incentives and restore the balance of power in US politics.