Creationism: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:04, 25 January 2024

If people were built from parts instead of grown, the Divine Watchmaker analogy would be apt. But that is not the case. The fractal analogy is apt.

Creationism and Intelligent Design are theories of creation based on literal interpretations of scripture.

A significant portion of the internet has been dedicated to debunking these claims so they won't be rehashed here. It's pretty obvious where the metaculture belief system stands on this issue.

See Creationism or Intelligent Design on Wikipedia.

This video fights literalism with literalism.

Top Ten Biblical Problems for Young Earth Creationists

Catholics are much more reasonable on this issue than Evangelicals. Sometime hierarchy helps.

Can a Christian Believe in Evolution?

Snarky Puppy - Intelligent Design

Revision as of 08:03, 25 January 2024 (view source) Fractalguy (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary Tag: Visual edit ← Older edit		Revision as of 08:04, 25 January 2024 (view source) Fractalguy (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary Tag: Visual edit Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:Creationism-intelligent-design-divine-watchmaker-young-earth.jpg\|thumb\|If people were built from parts instead of grown, the Divine Watchmaker analogy would be apt. But that is not the case.]]		[[File:Creationism-intelligent-design-divine-watchmaker-young-earth.jpg\|thumb\|If people were built from parts instead of grown, the Divine Watchmaker analogy would be apt. But that is not the case. The [[Fractal Geometry of God\|fractal]] analogy is apt.]]

	[[wikipedia:Creationism\|Creationism]] and [[wikipedia:Intelligent_design\|Intelligent Design]] are theories of [[creation]] based on [[literal]] interpretations of [[scripture]].		[[wikipedia:Creationism\|Creationism]] and [[wikipedia:Intelligent_design\|Intelligent Design]] are theories of [[creation]] based on [[literal]] interpretations of [[scripture]].