Gödel: Difference between revisions
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary Tag: Manual revert |
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:escher-drawing-hands.jpg| | [[File:escher-drawing-hands.jpg|right|frameless]] | ||
''The tao that can be described is not the eternal Tao. The name that can be spoken is not the eternal Name'' -Lao Tzu | ''The tao that can be described is not the eternal Tao. The name that can be spoken is not the eternal Name'' -Lao Tzu | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del,_Escher,_Bach Gödel, Escher, Bach] should be considered [[required reading]] for a full understanding of [[metaculture]]. | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del,_Escher,_Bach Gödel, Escher, Bach] should be considered [[required reading]] for a full understanding of [[metaculture]]. | ||
[[Special:WhatLinksHere/ | [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Gödel|View All References to Self-Reference]] | ||
Here's a basic explanation of Gödel's incompleteness theorem if such a thing exists. | Here's a basic explanation of Gödel's incompleteness theorem if such a thing exists. |
Revision as of 23:05, 21 January 2024

The tao that can be described is not the eternal Tao. The name that can be spoken is not the eternal Name -Lao Tzu
Godel's incompleteness theorems are fundamental to understanding the limits of scientific and mathematical knowledge and the power of self-reference. It proves the Taoist saying by demonstrating that we can never fully determine what is true using the language of mathematics.
Gödel, Escher, Bach should be considered required reading for a full understanding of metaculture.
View All References to Self-Reference
Here's a basic explanation of Gödel's incompleteness theorem if such a thing exists.
A free online course from MIT is available to help get the most out of this seminal work.
Technically this is based on another book by Hofstadter but it does a good job explaining a lot of the concepts of recursion and consciousness that are in GEB.