Reality: Difference between revisions

From metawiki
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Reality-consciousness-subjectivity.jpg|thumb|[[Simulation Theory|It's not a simulation]]]]
[[File:Reality-consciousness-subjectivity.jpg|thumb|[[Simulation Theory|It's not a simulation]]]]
[[metaculture]] assumes the truth of [[wikipedia:Philosophical_realism|philosophical realism]], or more specifically [[wikipedia:Scientific_realism|scientific realism]]. The reasons for this are:
[[metaculture]] assumes the truth of [[wikipedia:Philosophical_realism|philosophical realism]], or more specifically [[wikipedia:Scientific_realism|scientific realism]]. <blockquote>''"[[Life]] is not a [[Problems|problem]] to be solved, but a reality to be experienced."''  -[[wikipedia:Søren_Kierkegaard|Soren Kierkegaard]]</blockquote>The reasons for the acceptance of scientific realism are:


* No counter-example has ever been found to disprove the existence of an independent reality that conforms to the [[laws of physics]].
* No counter-example has ever been found to disprove the existence of an independent reality that conforms to the [[laws of physics]].

Latest revision as of 01:44, 16 February 2025

It's not a simulation

metaculture assumes the truth of philosophical realism, or more specifically scientific realism.

"Life is not a problem to be solved, but a reality to be experienced." -Soren Kierkegaard

The reasons for the acceptance of scientific realism are:

Given these options, the safest bet is obviously scientific realism.

Reality is real. Now deal.

Get the much more detailed version of this argument.

What is Scientific Realism?


Tame Impala - Reality in Motion