Fractal Tree of Knowledge: Difference between revisions
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Temptation-apple-eve-salience-reward-consequence.jpg|thumb|The Fractal Tree of Knowledge has significantly more explanatory power and less [[misogyny]] than the [[traditional]] [[wikipedia:Forbidden_fruit|apple-and-snake]] [[Metaphors|metaphor]].]] | [[File:Temptation-apple-eve-salience-reward-consequence.jpg|thumb|The Fractal Tree of Knowledge has significantly more explanatory power and less [[misogyny]] than the [[traditional]] [[wikipedia:Forbidden_fruit|apple-and-snake]] [[Metaphors|metaphor]]. It also takes a pro-knowledge stance instead of implying ignorance is paradise.]] | ||
This page describes an example [[Progress|progression]] of reasoning (i.e. [[wikipedia:Syllogism|syllogism]]) used to guide readers from one level of [[Necessary Prerequisite#Model for Hierarchical Complexity|cognitive complexity]] to the next. Each new step in the [[logic]] chain can an be thought of as an [[iteration]] in the [[fractal]] [[wikipedia:Tree_of_the_knowledge_of_good_and_evil|tree of knowledge]], because each one reveals a geometrically increasing number of corollary conclusions that expand the breadth of our [[ethical]] awareness. | This page describes an example [[Progress|progression]] of reasoning (i.e. [[wikipedia:Syllogism|syllogism]]) used to guide readers from one level of [[Necessary Prerequisite#Model for Hierarchical Complexity|cognitive complexity]] to the next. Each new step in the [[logic]] chain can an be thought of as an [[iteration]] in the [[fractal]] [[wikipedia:Tree_of_the_knowledge_of_good_and_evil|tree of knowledge]], because each one reveals a geometrically increasing number of corollary conclusions that expand the breadth, nuance, and [[complexity]] of our [[ethical]] awareness. | ||
On the [[Kohlberg]] scale, this is the equivalent to going from Stage 4 to Stage 6. | On the [[Kohlberg]] scale, this is the equivalent to going from Stage 4 to Stage 6. | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
This is an example of [[metaphor mapping]], providing a new, [[rational]] interpretation of a core [[religious]] [[allegory]]. | This is an example of [[metaphor mapping]], providing a new, [[rational]] interpretation of a core [[religious]] [[allegory]]. | ||
In the [[future]], similar paths can be constructed that start with other [[philosophical]] reference points, such as [[atheism]] or [[Libertarian|libertarianism]]. The eventual goal is to identify the key unique entry points based on the most common [[philosophical]], [[political]], and [[religious]] [[beliefs]], and provide customized curriculums that localize [[languages]], [[cultural]] references, [[religious]] [[allegories]], and [[Persuasion|rhetorical strategies]] to speak directly to the values and goals of each. This can be done using the [[wiki]] custom [[language]] function to [[wikipedia:Code-switching|code switch]] the entire [[philosophy]] to use the specific [[wikipedia:Vernacular|vernacular]] of the reader.[[File:Fractal-tree-of-knowledge-iteration-1-literalism-allegory.png|center|frame|Understanding the nature of [[Literalism]] versus [[Allegory]] and how it applies to our interpretation of [[scripture]] is the first building block.]] | |||
[[File:Fractal-tree-of-knowledge-iteration-2-pantheistic-universe-god.png|center|frame|If [[religion]] is an [[allegory]] for something, what is that something? It must be the [[universe]]. And that is why the idea of [[god]] is [[Universalist|universal]].]] | [[File:Fractal-tree-of-knowledge-iteration-2-pantheistic-universe-god.png|center|frame|If [[religion]] is an [[allegory]] for something, what is that something? It must be the [[universe]]. And that is why the idea of [[god]] is [[Universalist|universal]].]] | ||
[[File:Fractal-tree-of-knowledge-iteration-3-creation-evolution-big-bang.png|center|frame|If [[god]] is an [[allegory]] for the [[self-organizing]] [[universe]], then the [[Creation Story|creation story]] must be an [[allegory]] for the [[big bang]] and [[evolution]].]] | [[File:Fractal-tree-of-knowledge-iteration-3-creation-evolution-big-bang.png|center|frame|If [[god]] is an [[allegory]] for the [[self-organizing]] [[universe]], then the [[Creation Story|creation story]] must be an [[allegory]] for the [[big bang]] and [[evolution]].]] | ||
[[File:Fractal-tree-of-knowledge-iteration-4-brains-ethics-morality.png|center|frame|If [[god]] used [[evolution]] to create our [[brains]] and our [[emotions]], then our [[ethics]] and [[morality]] must have been instilled in us by our survival instincts.]] | [[File:Fractal-tree-of-knowledge-iteration-4-brains-ethics-morality.png|center|frame|If [[god]] used [[evolution]] to create our [[brains]] and our [[emotions]], then our [[ethics]] and [[morality]] must have been instilled in us by our survival instincts.]] | ||
[[File:Fractal-tree-of-knowledge-iteration-5-happiness-goal-evolution.png|center|frame|If [[Happiness and well-being|happiness]] is the [[emotion]] we feel when do what our [[brains]] were designed to do (survive), then improving our [[quality of life]] must be the [[Meaning of Life|goal of life]].]] | [[File:Fractal-tree-of-knowledge-iteration-5-happiness-goal-evolution.png|center|frame|If [[Happiness and well-being|happiness]] is the [[emotion]] we feel when do what our [[brains]] were designed to do (survive), then improving our [[quality of life]] must be the [[Meaning of Life|goal of life]].]] | ||
[[File:Fractal-tree-of-knowledge-iteration-final-evidence-based-best-practices.png|center|frame|Therefore we should [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|use all of the evidence at our disposal]] to create a [[society]] that maximizes [[Happiness|happiness and well-being]] for [[In-group|all people]]. This is represented by multiple [[iterations]] as [[scientific]] [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|evidence]] is gathered, applied, and updated into the [[future]].]] | [[File:Fractal-tree-of-knowledge-iteration-final-evidence-based-best-practices.png|center|frame|Therefore we should [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|use all of the evidence at our disposal]] to create a [[society]] that maximizes [[Happiness|happiness and well-being]] for [[In-group|all people]]. This is represented by multiple [[iterations]] as [[scientific]] [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|evidence]] is gathered, applied, and updated into the [[future]], and the full [[Fractal|pattern]] is revealed.]] | ||
== Tree of Videos == | |||
[https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/40611328-ishmael Daniel Quinn's Ishmael] offers a thought-provoking alternative interpretation of the [[creation story]] of Adam and Even and the Tree of Knowledge as an [[allegory]] for the agricultural revolution. | |||
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Odc1kQAKBQ||center|The Story of Humanity - Ishmael by Daniel Quinn|frame}} | |||
<br> | |||
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkpMfbBgILY||center|Pursuit of Happiness - Tree of Knowledge|frame}} | |||
<br> | |||
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1lclBJMLuA||center|Shadaye - Tree of Knowledge|frame}} |
Latest revision as of 21:57, 12 February 2025

This page describes an example progression of reasoning (i.e. syllogism) used to guide readers from one level of cognitive complexity to the next. Each new step in the logic chain can an be thought of as an iteration in the fractal tree of knowledge, because each one reveals a geometrically increasing number of corollary conclusions that expand the breadth, nuance, and complexity of our ethical awareness.
On the Kohlberg scale, this is the equivalent to going from Stage 4 to Stage 6.
In this progression, we go from a fundamentalist religious perspective to a new generating equation based on universalism and the pursuit of happiness through scientific evidence. It does this by systematically filling in the gaps in knowledge and reasoning until the desired level of understanding is obtained and a new pattern of thought is adopted. It is persuasion through targeted education and apt allegory.
This is an example of metaphor mapping, providing a new, rational interpretation of a core religious allegory.
In the future, similar paths can be constructed that start with other philosophical reference points, such as atheism or libertarianism. The eventual goal is to identify the key unique entry points based on the most common philosophical, political, and religious beliefs, and provide customized curriculums that localize languages, cultural references, religious allegories, and rhetorical strategies to speak directly to the values and goals of each. This can be done using the wiki custom language function to code switch the entire philosophy to use the specific vernacular of the reader.






Tree of Videos
Daniel Quinn's Ishmael offers a thought-provoking alternative interpretation of the creation story of Adam and Even and the Tree of Knowledge as an allegory for the agricultural revolution.