Religious Freedom: Difference between revisions
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Freedom-of-religion-jesus-moses-buddha-krishna-in-a-convertible-with-the-top-down.jpg|thumb|Nothing says [[freedom]] like a convertible with the top down]] | [[File:Freedom-of-religion-jesus-moses-buddha-krishna-in-a-convertible-with-the-top-down.jpg|thumb|Nothing says [[freedom]] like a convertible with the top down]] | ||
If the goal of our society is [[utilitarian]] [[happiness]], then it's pretty obvious that allowing [[wikipedia:Freedom_of_religion|freedom of religion]] and worship would be a key component. Forcing anyone outside the mainstream to publicly deny one of the most important aspects of their identify is going to have some devastating consequences on the aggregate [[happiness and well-being]] of that [[society]]. | If the goal of our society is [[utilitarian]] [[happiness]], then it's pretty obvious that allowing [[wikipedia:Freedom_of_religion|freedom of religion]] and worship would be a key component. Forcing anyone outside the mainstream to publicly deny one of the most important aspects of their identify is going to have some devastating [[consequences]] on the aggregate [[happiness and well-being]] of that [[society]].<blockquote>''"Ultimately, America's answer to the intolerant man is diversity, the very diversity which our heritage of [[religious]] [[freedom]] has inspired."'' -[[wikipedia:Robert_F._Kennedy|Robert Kennedy]]</blockquote>[[wikipedia:Separation_of_church_and_state|Separation of Church and State]] is a related [[political]] [[best practice]] that helps ensure that [[religious]] [[freedom]] is not eroded over time. | ||
[[wikipedia:Separation_of_church_and_state|Separation of Church and State]] is a related [[political]] [[best practice]] that helps ensure that [[religious]] [[freedom]] is not eroded over time. | |||
== State Religion Undermines Faith == | == State Religion Undermines Faith == | ||
Line 9: | Line 7: | ||
While evangelists may find it tempting to use the power of [[government]] to endorse their [[Belief System|belief system]], any effort to do so undermines [[freedom]] of thought, leading to the [[faith]] of a rebellious child who goes through the motions to avoid getting in trouble but has no [[love]] for [[god]], and would quickly leave if there were no consequences to doing so. Is it worth it just to boost attendance at services? | While evangelists may find it tempting to use the power of [[government]] to endorse their [[Belief System|belief system]], any effort to do so undermines [[freedom]] of thought, leading to the [[faith]] of a rebellious child who goes through the motions to avoid getting in trouble but has no [[love]] for [[god]], and would quickly leave if there were no consequences to doing so. Is it worth it just to boost attendance at services? | ||
There are also the [[theological]] debates about which translation of [[scripture]] or sectarian interpretation is going to be held above all others, which [[inevitably]] results in the elevation of a minority option to an official position of the state. The vast majority of believers will have their [[freedom]] to worship the way they wish curtailed.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIkExtjiUOk||center|Freedom of Religion|frame}} | There are also the [[theological]] debates about which translation of [[scripture]] or sectarian interpretation is going to be held above all others, which [[inevitably]] results in the elevation of a minority option to an official position of the state. The vast majority of believers will have their [[freedom]] to worship the way they wish curtailed. | ||
When worshipping the state [[religion]] is optional, it likely tends to discourage rather than encourage participation. Especially if one looks at demographic trends among the industrialized nations with official state [[religions]].{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIkExtjiUOk||center|Freedom of Religion|frame}} | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvOCSvEfPyg||center|Roger Trigg on the Importance of Religious Freedom|frame}} | {{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvOCSvEfPyg||center|Roger Trigg on the Importance of Religious Freedom|frame}} | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hbYAfTQwmw||center|NOFX - The Separation of Church and Skate|frame}} | {{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hbYAfTQwmw||center|NOFX - The Separation of Church and Skate|frame}} |
Latest revision as of 01:35, 16 February 2025

If the goal of our society is utilitarian happiness, then it's pretty obvious that allowing freedom of religion and worship would be a key component. Forcing anyone outside the mainstream to publicly deny one of the most important aspects of their identify is going to have some devastating consequences on the aggregate happiness and well-being of that society.
"Ultimately, America's answer to the intolerant man is diversity, the very diversity which our heritage of religious freedom has inspired." -Robert Kennedy
Separation of Church and State is a related political best practice that helps ensure that religious freedom is not eroded over time.
State Religion Undermines Faith
One of the core tenets of any religion is that the believer must come to the faith of their own free will. This principle is fully undermined when there is state sponsorship of religion. The coercive effects of even the mildest official endorsement, especially in the classroom where impressionable children see teachers as trusted authority figures.
While evangelists may find it tempting to use the power of government to endorse their belief system, any effort to do so undermines freedom of thought, leading to the faith of a rebellious child who goes through the motions to avoid getting in trouble but has no love for god, and would quickly leave if there were no consequences to doing so. Is it worth it just to boost attendance at services?
There are also the theological debates about which translation of scripture or sectarian interpretation is going to be held above all others, which inevitably results in the elevation of a minority option to an official position of the state. The vast majority of believers will have their freedom to worship the way they wish curtailed.
When worshipping the state religion is optional, it likely tends to discourage rather than encourage participation. Especially if one looks at demographic trends among the industrialized nations with official state religions.