Big bang: Difference between revisions
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Big-bang-galaxy-nebula-stars-space-universe.jpg|thumb|Another Big Bang By-Product]] | [[File:Big-bang-galaxy-nebula-stars-space-universe.jpg|thumb|Another Big Bang By-Product]] | ||
References to the | References to the big bang refer not necessarily to the original [[wikipedia:Big_Bang|big bang theory]] but rather our latest, best understanding of the origins of the [[universe]] according to [[science]], regardless of what form it takes. | ||
As our understanding of the early moments of the [[universe]] evolves, the specifics of whether all [[matter]] was concentrated in a single point that exploded into an expanding [[universe]], or if arose spontaneously across an infinite empty space, or any other theory that agrees with the observable data, makes no difference in how [[metaculture]] is understood. | As our understanding of the early moments of the [[universe]] evolves, the specifics of whether all [[matter]] was concentrated in a single point that exploded into an expanding [[universe]], or if arose spontaneously across an infinite empty space, or any other theory that agrees with the observable data, makes no difference in how [[metaculture]] is understood. <blockquote>''"We're all in the big bang gang."'' -[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vi039BihSAk Cunk and Cox] </blockquote>The only important point is that a [[scientific]] [[creation story]] ultimately exists that conforms to the actual [[laws of physics]], regardless of how accurately our current theories are able to describe it. | ||
See [[Creation Story]] for details on the latest [[scientific]] theories of our origins and creative ways to explain it. | |||
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzhIfN4UQv8||center||frame}} | {{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzhIfN4UQv8||center||frame}} |
Latest revision as of 19:06, 4 January 2025

References to the big bang refer not necessarily to the original big bang theory but rather our latest, best understanding of the origins of the universe according to science, regardless of what form it takes.
As our understanding of the early moments of the universe evolves, the specifics of whether all matter was concentrated in a single point that exploded into an expanding universe, or if arose spontaneously across an infinite empty space, or any other theory that agrees with the observable data, makes no difference in how metaculture is understood.
"We're all in the big bang gang." -Cunk and Cox
The only important point is that a scientific creation story ultimately exists that conforms to the actual laws of physics, regardless of how accurately our current theories are able to describe it.
See Creation Story for details on the latest scientific theories of our origins and creative ways to explain it.