Authoritarianism: Difference between revisions
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) (Created page with "In politics the abuses of both progressive and conservative political movements are due to Authoritarianism versus Communism, Socialism, Fascism or any...") |
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) |
||
(21 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[politics]] the abuses of both [[progressive]] and [[conservative]] political movements are due to Authoritarianism | [[File:Authoritarianism-dictatorship-strongman-fascism-1984-orwell.jpg|thumb|Lol that was 40 years ago]] | ||
In [[politics]] the abuses of both [[progressive]] and [[conservative]] political movements are due to Authoritarianism rather than [[Communism]], [[Socialism]], [[Fascism]] or any other any other [[political]] and [[economic]] systems that have existed. The ones that are [[good]] allow the most [[freedom]] to citizens in both [[social]] and [[economic]] terms, and the ones that are bad restrict those [[Freedom|freedoms]].<blockquote>''“If you want a picture of the [[future]], imagine a boot stamping on a human face—for ever.”'' -[[wikipedia:Nineteen_Eighty-Four|George Orwell, 1984]]</blockquote>Dystopias provide counter-examples to be avoided. Don't be a [[bootlicker]]. Avoid Orwell's warning and choose the [[freedom]]. | |||
See [[Authority]] and [[Balance of power|Balance of Power]] for relevant discussions of power dynamics. | |||
In case you didn't know, authoritarianism [[is bad]]. | |||
In the vast majority of modern online discourse, anyone who labels someone else a [[Communist]], [[Socialist]], or [[Fascist]] can be substituted with ''Authoritarian'' and the result will be | == One Thing We Can Agree On? == | ||
Typical right-wing [[arguments]] against [[Socialism]] use the most authoritarian counter-examples, [[like]] the USSR or Venezuela under Chavez, when there are plenty of examples of European countries that thrive under various forms of social [[democracy]] with much greater degrees of personal [[freedom]] than the US. That additional [[freedom]] (and the [[happiness]] citizens report as a result) is apparent when you consider the economic [[freedom]] that the vast majority of people gain via [[social safety nets]], [[universal health care]] and employment regulations. These protect citizens from the ups and downs of [[capitalism]] and ensures a minimum [[standard of living]] regardless of circumstance. [[Freedom]] from destitution is desirable. | |||
Typical left-wing arguments against [[Fascism]] tend to compare all things right-wing to Hitler, even though [[Libertarians]] have been ahead of the [[Democratic Party]] on drug legalization, gay marriage, opposing the [[police]] state, and a number of other [[progressive]] social issues despite leaning right on [[economic]] policy. | |||
In the vast majority of modern [[Social media|online discourse]], anyone who labels someone else a [[Communist]], [[Socialist]], or [[Fascist]] can be substituted with ''Authoritarian'' and the result will be more [[Political|politically]] and [[historically]] accurate and less partisan. Self-described [[Communist|communists]] and [[Fascist|fascists]] notwithstanding. | |||
We should strive to minimize support for authoritarian leaders, and to set up [[balance of power]] systems in [[government]] and the [[economy]] to limit the damage they can do. This should be something that [[progressives]], [[conservatives]], and [[libertarians]] can all agree on. | |||
Of course, there is now a cohort who truly [[believe]] authoritarian rule is the solution to the shortcomings of [[democracy]]. We can disagree with them vehemently. | |||
== Theories of Authoritarian Control == | |||
There is a common pattern in the ways that authoritarian [[leaders]] exert their control upon those who follow them, be they heads of state, CEOs, [[religious]] figures, or even [[family]] members. High-control groups are typically referred to as cults, but they can be formed around any [[in-group]] or [[Culture|subculture]], not [[just]] [[wikipedia:New_religious_movement|New Religious Movements]]. | |||
The [https://freedomofmind.com/cult-mind-control/bite-model-pdf-download/ BITE Model of Authoritarian Control] provides a comprehensive checklist of authoritarian [[control]] techniques that you can use to determine if a particular group, [[political]] movement, or group [[leader]], has authoritarian tendencies that you should be wary of. | |||
Regardless of any differences we have in our [[ideology]], [[religion]], [[culture]], or opinions on the best ways to seek [[happiness]], we should all agree that authoritarian control techniques are [[taboo]], and those who seek to use them should be ashamed of themselves. | |||
[[wikipedia:Regality_theory|Regality theory]] or the [[wikipedia:Regality_theory|theory of regal and kungic societal structures]] relates perceived [[safety]] and fear to support for [[hierarchy]] and authoritarianism. When people don't feel [[safe]], they tend to support leaders that project [[power]] and retributive [[justice]] against the perceived causes of crime and instability. [[wikipedia:Negativity_bias|Negativity bias]] in the [[media]] creates a [[feedback loop]] where [[profit]] motives [[Incentives|incentivize]] [[outrage]] and fear based reporting, causing people to support authoritarian leaders that amplify these fear-based messages. Even in one of the most "[[wikipedia:Regality_theory|kungic]]" [[societies]] in [[history]] (stable, [[safe]], peaceful), we have unprecedented levels of fear and anxiety leading us to give up [[democracy]] and [[freedom]] to save us from fears that are mostly in our heads. | |||
This [[culture]] needs a [[placebo]]! [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1Tpe-dbPQI] | |||
The book [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/56898187-corruptible Corruptible: Who Gets Power and How It Changes Us by Brian Klaas] is an excellent primer on power, [[corruption]], and people behave the way they do when they are given power. [https://www.powercorruptspodcast.com/ Klass's Power Corrupts] [[podcast]] explores these [[concepts]] in detail. | |||
== Make Brains Dirty Again == | |||
See [[Brains#Make Brains Dirty Again|Make Brains Dirty Again]] to get a prescription for building [[brain]] [[resilience]] based on [[contrarian]] approach to common brainwashing techniques. | |||
== Watch These Videos Or Else == | |||
Avoid the gulag! Check out these videos!{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1tXjJobjfs||center|Understanding what authoritarianism is|frame}} | |||
<br> | |||
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMNwUh0X5eI||center|The Rise of Modern Populism|frame}} | |||
<br> | |||
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhPOrkGbpxk||center|We need to talk about Authoritarianism|frame}} | |||
<br> | |||
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlbJtgYEM1U||center|Why Oligarchy Falls (And How to Speed It Up)|frame}} | |||
<br> | |||
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNyqyFNoHKw||center|1984 (1956 Movie)|frame}} | |||
== Mandatory Fun == | |||
The best things in [[life]] are required.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uh-alkmzjqg&list=PL6ogdCG3tAWga6QYkr6nnC_7rdvxVx_vj||center|Weird Al - Mandatory Fun (Full Album)|frame}} | |||
<br> | |||
{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/eWzIlCJAw-o||center|Sonic Youth - Youth Against Fascism|frame}} |
Latest revision as of 08:35, 16 February 2025

In politics the abuses of both progressive and conservative political movements are due to Authoritarianism rather than Communism, Socialism, Fascism or any other any other political and economic systems that have existed. The ones that are good allow the most freedom to citizens in both social and economic terms, and the ones that are bad restrict those freedoms.
“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—for ever.” -George Orwell, 1984
Dystopias provide counter-examples to be avoided. Don't be a bootlicker. Avoid Orwell's warning and choose the freedom.
See Authority and Balance of Power for relevant discussions of power dynamics.
In case you didn't know, authoritarianism is bad.
One Thing We Can Agree On?
Typical right-wing arguments against Socialism use the most authoritarian counter-examples, like the USSR or Venezuela under Chavez, when there are plenty of examples of European countries that thrive under various forms of social democracy with much greater degrees of personal freedom than the US. That additional freedom (and the happiness citizens report as a result) is apparent when you consider the economic freedom that the vast majority of people gain via social safety nets, universal health care and employment regulations. These protect citizens from the ups and downs of capitalism and ensures a minimum standard of living regardless of circumstance. Freedom from destitution is desirable.
Typical left-wing arguments against Fascism tend to compare all things right-wing to Hitler, even though Libertarians have been ahead of the Democratic Party on drug legalization, gay marriage, opposing the police state, and a number of other progressive social issues despite leaning right on economic policy.
In the vast majority of modern online discourse, anyone who labels someone else a Communist, Socialist, or Fascist can be substituted with Authoritarian and the result will be more politically and historically accurate and less partisan. Self-described communists and fascists notwithstanding.
We should strive to minimize support for authoritarian leaders, and to set up balance of power systems in government and the economy to limit the damage they can do. This should be something that progressives, conservatives, and libertarians can all agree on.
Of course, there is now a cohort who truly believe authoritarian rule is the solution to the shortcomings of democracy. We can disagree with them vehemently.
Theories of Authoritarian Control
There is a common pattern in the ways that authoritarian leaders exert their control upon those who follow them, be they heads of state, CEOs, religious figures, or even family members. High-control groups are typically referred to as cults, but they can be formed around any in-group or subculture, not just New Religious Movements.
The BITE Model of Authoritarian Control provides a comprehensive checklist of authoritarian control techniques that you can use to determine if a particular group, political movement, or group leader, has authoritarian tendencies that you should be wary of.
Regardless of any differences we have in our ideology, religion, culture, or opinions on the best ways to seek happiness, we should all agree that authoritarian control techniques are taboo, and those who seek to use them should be ashamed of themselves.
Regality theory or the theory of regal and kungic societal structures relates perceived safety and fear to support for hierarchy and authoritarianism. When people don't feel safe, they tend to support leaders that project power and retributive justice against the perceived causes of crime and instability. Negativity bias in the media creates a feedback loop where profit motives incentivize outrage and fear based reporting, causing people to support authoritarian leaders that amplify these fear-based messages. Even in one of the most "kungic" societies in history (stable, safe, peaceful), we have unprecedented levels of fear and anxiety leading us to give up democracy and freedom to save us from fears that are mostly in our heads.
This culture needs a placebo! [1]
The book Corruptible: Who Gets Power and How It Changes Us by Brian Klaas is an excellent primer on power, corruption, and people behave the way they do when they are given power. Klass's Power Corrupts podcast explores these concepts in detail.
Make Brains Dirty Again
See Make Brains Dirty Again to get a prescription for building brain resilience based on contrarian approach to common brainwashing techniques.
Watch These Videos Or Else
Avoid the gulag! Check out these videos!
Mandatory Fun
The best things in life are required.